Steve James wrote:I've seen this guy called lots of names. He's just making a symbolic act with his own property. If he beats his sword into a plowshare, that is his business. It's less wasteful than putting a Tesla roadster in space.
Michael wrote:A few months back there was a man who killed 26 people in a church and kept firing until a hero with an AR-15, who ran barefoot from his house next door stopped him. That's a hero, Stephen Willeford, a man who risked his life and stood toe to toe with a murderer and exchanged fire with him using a weapon that requires knowledge, training, skill and preparedness.
Man who shot and chased Texas church shooter gives emotional account to police in video
Extensive video interview by Willeford a few days later.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4HEchh0XD8
Hero Who Chased Down Sutherland Springs Shooter: “Act Now, Ask Questions Later…”
So, you are going to accuse this guy of politicizing yet you present an essentially fabricated fantasy of the lone vigilante saving the day. Full of shit as usual.
First of all, even if we pretend that this vigilante burst into the church and killed the mass shooter mid-spree, would that somehow validate what you are getting at? No, because the body count is still incredibly skewed.
Furthermore, this dipshit showed up after the fact, started shooting at the killer, couldn't even hit him, and then chased him down in *another commandeered vehicle* and found the guy in a ditch dead from his own weapon. Suicide. The killer was already done and on his way out.
Finally, I thought you served? The M-4, M-16, or any American style long rifle is not hard to use, does not require much or any training, or any particular knowledge. Given that, the fact that he couldn't even hit his target makes all of your comments ridiculous.
And you, who comes on here crusading against Antifa in the defense of ethno-nationalists, are the last one to call anyone else out for being political and partisan.
Get the fuck out of here with that shit.
Ian C. Kuzushi wrote:Finally, I thought you served? The M-4, M-16, or any American style long rifle is not hard to use, does not require much or any training, or any particular knowledge. Given that, the fact that he couldn't even hit his target makes all of your comments ridiculous.
Michael wrote:Ian C. Kuzushi wrote:Finally, I thought you served? The M-4, M-16, or any American style long rifle is not hard to use, does not require much or any training, or any particular knowledge. Given that, the fact that he couldn't even hit his target makes all of your comments ridiculous.
How do you know he didn't hit his target? I'm going by his interview and various news sources. They could be wrong.
Yes, I was in the Marines, so I know something about shooting and it's really your comments about weapons training that are beyond ridiculous. You very obviously know nothing about combat, marksmanship or the training needed to bring them together. With such ignorance and the inability to listen, you're really unqualified to speak here in a technical or emotional sense.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests