GrahamB wrote:Do you think you can explain it as if I was a 5 year old? I can't get it from what you wrote + jargon.
Quigga wrote:I can see it working, it would take some dedication and old discussions would flare up with renewed passion...
Organsing the archives would mean dividing the wealth of knowledge in different sub-categories. Participating members would need to give their opinion in at least monthly intervals to achieve something fruitfull over the span of 3 years.
Sort of like an IMA wikipedia with actual fact checks and names as well as faces behind claims and theories...
The question would be where to start. At the beginning, I guess![]()
So what should the curriculum be? Everything we agree and disagree on... Different names for the same things...
At least, I think it would be a tremendous waste to let our treasures stagnate...
Let the lotus rise from the bottom and blossom on the water's surface
Return to FAQs, Reference, Hall of Fame
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest