Andy_S wrote:Gents:
What is the historical/developmental relationship between Xinyi and Xingyi (if any)?
I am curious as I practice neither system, but if the latter developed from the former:
- What are the strong points of each?
- Is Xingyi 'watered down' Xinyi
- Or is Xinyi 'stuck-in-the-past' Xingyi?
Both!
If you look at Dai family xinyiquan (sometimes called liuhexinyiquan), older branches of xingyiquan, and newer branches of xingyiquan, you can see a clear progression/evolution. In general, some material is lost (or deliberately pared away) at each step, while a bit of new material is added as well (for example, 17 animal methods became 12 animal methods). Additionally, body mechanics in general seem to become less overt (more subtle) (for example, hubu (gongbu) methods became santi methods). Xingyiquan also was affected by other styles in Beijing, like baguazhang (for example, xingyiquan added baguazhang's 9 palace stepping).
Certain of the wuxingquan (5 elements) also show a clear progression from xinyiliuhequan, Dai family xinyiquan, older lineages of xingyiquan, and newer lineages of xingyiquan as well (such as piquan).
Also interesting are the quanpu - many words/songs are very similar, but seem to have changed slightly (mistakes? many of the differences sound similar but mean something else) through the years.