masterwill wrote:In yue fei's army( who creat xingyi and xinyi),all the Generals practise xingyi,but soldiers practise xinyi.because for soldiers they need something which should easy to learn and useful MA,so yue fei creat xinyi from his xingyi for all soldiers,but for Generals they are looking for higher level,so they do xing yi.also u can say xin yi is a external but which belong to internal martial art.
but most of people will like xin yi alot.because everybody wanna study things quickly,I think that's also one of the reason why the real IMA developed not so well.it takes time.
Hi Will,
The whole story with Yueh Fei creating a martial art for his soldiers as far as I know expired long ago. There has been quite some research done recently on Xin Yi Liu He Quans origins, by researcher/practitioners like, Jiafei, Jarek, Ma Lei Shi and Dr Yan. Recently the subject of interest that was brought to my attention was the Tong Bei Quan/XYLHQ connection. If you search on this board you will find it, otherwise I guess I can email it to you. Supposedly (I never had a chance to compare) the original Tong Be Quan chuan pu names match a lot of the terminology in XYLHQ.
Xing Yi Quan was created with Dai Xin Yi Quan as a base and then further developed under Li Laoneng and other experts.
As a Dai Xin Yi Quan practitioner I am told, Li Laoneng was taught by Guo Weihan. Guo was a nephew of Dai Longbang's 2nd wife. It is said that Li Laoneng was taught a modified version of Dai, without the, hu bu (bow stance) and Dai shen fa (dan tian rotations), either due to the time limit they had to train him or could be to not pass on the art in it's entirety, due to strict secrecy of the clan art.
People have mentioned that Li Laoneng created the, tuo xing (water lizard), this is not true, this is almost identical to Dai, she xing (snake).
As for the whole internal/external debate, I am very sick of hearing about this anymore, to me this is just a debate started by the literati and if you practice, wai jia quan to a deep level, you should have deep, nei gong. I do agree that there is a differnce between the 2, but I do not obsess about it.
JB.