The compass points and "eight gates" demonstrate the principle of the cyclical exchange of yin and yang that operates unendingly in its course. Thus it is indispensable to understand the "four sides" and "four corners." The "four sides" techniques are ward-off, roll-back, press, and push; the "four corners" techniques are pull-down, split, elbow-stroke, and shoulder stroke. Combining the corners and sides techniques, we derive the trigrams of the gate positions.
Steve James wrote: Using your argument, why teach the form at all. Or rather why do Grasp Bird's Tail?
everything wrote:it makes me think of those FMA angles of attack and footwork charts
Steve James wrote:I agree it's about transitioning and adapting, not just attacking. Graham said that it comes down to yin and yang, but that eventually generates the 10000 things. So, they have to be specified. For ex., I'd argue that the "push" hands exercises deal with handling (and delivering) pushes, and the "da lu" exercises deal with handling and delivering pulls. Of course that's a super duper over-simplification.
In the Yang "Forty Chapters," chapter one is about the "sides" and "corners" or "eight gates."The compass points and "eight gates" demonstrate the principle of the cyclical exchange of yin and yang that operates unendingly in its course. Thus it is indispensable to understand the "four sides" and "four corners." The "four sides" techniques are ward-off, roll-back, press, and push; the "four corners" techniques are pull-down, split, elbow-stroke, and shoulder stroke. Combining the corners and sides techniques, we derive the trigrams of the gate positions.
I don't think it's necessary to derive trigrams. Then again, I wouldn't know how.
D_Glenn wrote:I had to go back and see if I had posted anything with the Bagua perspective, but I came across something Wuyidizi wrote, and basically that Treatise on the Four Corners that Origami posted is accurate, but it doesn’t really explain why.
It’s about how movements transition from one thing into the other. It should be round, curving, smooth and flowing- a Circle. But inside that circle is a square and the corners of the square can poke out if need be. But it doesn’t have to be a hit. A corner can be something like an arm drag. It’s an erratic but necessary movement.
Maybe a car analogy would work: say that your martial movements are like the suspension of an expensive car. It’s like you’re floating across the road, not feeling any bumps or imperfections. But then your wheel rolls over a rock or a pothole in the road and it jars you, the whole car shudders, but then you just resume rolling down the road.
.
Trick wrote:Much talking of four corner - did we misread “four character” ?
Bao wrote:Appledog wrote:If you can do it, picking up a few students to teach xiangqi or weiqi is a nice passtime when you are not training. Piano teacher is good too. It's something I would like to pursue but, time is always against us. But then if we do not take time, how can we ever have time?
I think I might, cautiously, get back into weiqi these days. You can meet a lot of friends with these games.
I know many Tai Chi people who play weiqi. Some believe that it balances their practice. Actually, in more recent years, I have found that you can translate weiqi strategy to push hands. For instance, you want to control the four corners in weiqi, as well as the middle point at the two sides. In push hands, you want to control the shoulders and the centerline of yourself and your opponent. If you focus on dominating the four corners, you will have an advantage and can more easily dominate the rest of the space. Remember also that there's a "four corner push hands". The name is there for a reason.
origami_itto wrote: I want to say that I think that's a good strategy,
but that it is not what the Yangs mean by the corners.
Bao wrote:origami_itto wrote: I want to say that I think that's a good strategy,
Great, you got what I meantbut that it is not what the Yangs mean by the corners.
Yeah, I know.
Bao wrote:origami_itto wrote: I want to say that I think that's a good strategy,
Great, you got what I meantbut that it is not what the Yangs mean by the corners.
Yeah, I know.
BruceP wrote:nobody has described HOW it's trained/explored for practical purposes.
Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests