schmuhl wrote:Foot -> body -> step, right? While the subtle practitioner leads all strikes with the foot (rooting regardless of whether or not he is stepping), that doesn't mean that the strike is telegraphed by the body.
I'd worry that allowing the hand to lead the foot (in baguazhang anyway) would compromise alignment and rooting, especially with all the fancy-pants circling.
mixjourneyman wrote:I don't think you will find the idea of jab anywhere in IMA for that very reason.
Josealb wrote:Every good cross should have a half step. Rocky Marciano and Dempsey are good examples.
Dmitri wrote:mixjourneyman wrote:I don't think you will find the idea of jab anywhere in IMA for that very reason.
Umm... Perhaps we mean different things by "jab"? I'm using the term "jab" to simply indicate the fact that "front hand" punches (vs. the rear one/"cross")
All 3 main CIMAs have a motherload of those, in all sorts of variations and flavors.
Dmitri wrote:...or paint your nails on it.
ParryPerson wrote:Dale Dugas wrote:Hands and feet should move at the same time.
My question is, why on earth would they not? I mean, I'm super new, and I was never taught foot or "fist" first, it's just a full movement done at once.
Why would you move one thing before the other?
I'm not saying any way is the right and only way, I'm just honestly curious as a newbie
mixjourneyman wrote:Remember, you can throw a hook or an uppercut with the front hand too
Dmitri wrote:BTW that particular thing has always been "amusing" (for the lack of better word -- no disrespect implied) to me, i.e. that cross is considered (by non-IMA types) more powerful than jab. There should be no difference whatsoever between how powerful those two are, if one practices IMA.
Just MHO; others' mileage will vary as always.
Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests