by Chris McKinley on Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:43 am
mixjourneyman wrote that Taijiquan is full of thousands of techniques for handling punches and kicks. He also stated that any posture could be used for attack and defense, implying perhaps that any posture at all would be sufficient as a defense against punches and/or kicks. However, DeusTrismegistus's question still stands mostly unanswered. Here's why.
mix's response was one of pure theory and Platonic ideal. Yes, ideally, every posture should be capable of being interpreted as a defense against a punch or kick, as well as its own counteroffensive move. Having practiced since '82 with a recent two-year break, I know that I can come up with that information from any posture in the system. But the systematic analysis that lets me do that also lets me find such information in interpretive jazz dance, breakdancing, and volleyball, too. The sentiment of finding both attack and defense in each posture represents only the Platonic ideal of what Taijiquan should be striving for, not what is in day to day practice. I posit for consideration that there has never existed the practitioner who could use literally any Taijiquan posture, chosen at random, to defend against whatever might come his way in a fight.
Another obvious flaw with this reasoning is that, unless you clairvoyantly know exactly what the opponent is going to execute against you in real time, each time he throws something at you, you cannot possibly hope to select just the right posture (and its hypothetically perfect defense) in time to use it correctly. Not only does action beat reaction, but there would be option anxiety to deal with as well.
Perhaps the final nail in the coffin of this line of reasoning, though, is the fact that, no matter how many ingenious built-in attacks/defenses each posture of your art contains, exactly none of it will do you any bit of good unless you've practiced it to the point of unconscious functionality. The real question then becomes, 'how many of these postures have you (in the everyman sense) learned to use against punches and kicks?' Merely saying or implying that it doesn't matter because every posture contains both attacks and defenses suitable to the purpose is a grand intellectual red herring. No matter what's in your art, each practitioner has access to exactly none of it save what they personally have practiced to the point of real combat functionality.
I would have a far tougher time in a fight handling the guy who has studied Taijiquan for 20 years but has only practiced the Grasp the Sparrow's Tail Set the whole time, versus the identical guy who has studied Taijiquan for 20 years and has tried to memorize the attack and defense applications of every posture in the style. The former guy I might underestimate and be clobbered by.....the latter guy I would make my bitch at will.
Remember, martial arts and styles do not exist in and of themselves, folks. They are abstract labels for sets of physical behavior on the part of humans. If the physical behavior isn't present, neither is the art...nor anything it contains.
Last edited by Chris McKinley on Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:48 am, edited 1 time in total.