Peacedog wrote:this is about the worst example of a first world latte faux outrage problem
Peacedog wrote:Given the Asian predilection for extremely crappy pedagogy, and cultism, the actual tools for effecting this are typically difficult to discern from the stuff that is a waste of time.
Peacedog wrote:Apparently it backfired. Peloton lost 10% of their stock price after the whole kerfuffle.
And they are nice bikes. The SJW crowd just got another scalp. That said, the controversy might be good for publicity like you said. But as expensive as those things are I'm just not sure what the market is.
Peacedog wrote:I won't comment on the Peloton chick other than to say this is about the worst example of a first world latte faux outrage problem I've seen in quite some time.
As for martial arts writ large, and this is true of both MMA and TMA, these things have long since transitioned from practical tools to the realm of entertainment and sport.
TMAs are firmly in the lifestyle and entertainment camp. That means a more serious approach is far less likely.
The transformational effects are what they are. Given the Asian predilection for extremely crappy pedagogy, and cultism, the actual tools for effecting this are typically difficult to discern from the stuff that is a waste of time. Delusion is not unique to TMA and figuring all of that out is just as difficult for a martial artist as it is for a monastic or a Western magician working in a stone circle in the country side.
I would say that one of the biggest threats to the viability of TMA, and the primary one behind their decline writ large, is that modern people have a lot of choices as to what to do with their time. Sometimes this is productive like getting that petroleum engineering degree and other times not so much as in playing Dragon Age III. Traditionally a lot of martial arts had many participants as there simply wasn't much to do in the village after about 5 pm every day and you had to give the fellas something to do or they were going to get into trouble. This was particularly true for young, unmarried and bored men between the ages of 15-25.
The more successful schools I've seen fall into two camps: belt based systems for kids (parents love to spend money on that stuff) and people who form a large personal following of mostly men in their early thirties to late fourties as these guys are firmly into their careers and need an hour or so of personal time per day away from family/business. The second group is far more likely to become culty if a significant number of the participants are women and the head instructor is a man.
None of this is bad. But if you want your art to survive some kind of mechanism has to be in place give you the personal space you need to fund all of that practice time. The economics of this kind of thing has always been important and people ignore that at their peril. Keep in mind a lot of the better practitioners in the 80's came out of a time in mainland China where communism has destroyed the ability to do anything meaningful with your life. So it left a lot of time to practice with. As there was nothing else to do.
Peacedog wrote:Apparently it backfired. Peloton lost 10% of their stock price after the whole kerfuffle.
And they are nice bikes. The SJW crowd just got another scalp. That said, the controversy might be good for publicity like you said. But as expensive as those things are I'm just not sure what the market is.
Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests