C.J.W. wrote:Some say all 3 internals are the same, but I feel that while there's overlap between them, each also brings something unique to the table.
In Bagua's case, it's the practice of circle-walking and how it specifically aims to develop the ability to revolve 3 dimensionally around imaginary fulcrums in space (i.e., outside the body), which opens up a whole new world of possibilities in terms of combat applications.
But this is where things get tricky. If you just go through the motion and practice Bagua without precisely knowing where the fixed fulcrums are and how to shift them accordingly as you move, all you are left with is a dance routine done on a circle -- void of power and stability.
Universally (e.g., CMA, MMA, judo, football, basketball, etc.), practicing footwork should include developing the ability to revolve around an opponent to gain a superior position.
While practicing footwork, you should imagine an opponent's center that can constantly change and shift accordingly.
Clip of a Bagua guy in a fight. What is he missing?

Which illustrates what I meant about drills/demos that are unrealistic here, "A bridge between the striking art and the throwing art:"
marvin8 wrote:That is not a realistic demo of "bridging between the striking art and the throwing art," because
1. Trained strikers/kickers will not stand that close. Safe fighting distance is outside of striking and kicking range.
2. The opponent will move or punch you in the face before you step and perform multiple actions.
3. Most strikers will stand orthodox, which may require you to throw/train with your left side.