by Steve James on Thu Dec 09, 2021 10:01 am
Ultimately, I think one trains "internal" using "external" and vice versa, anyway. It'll come down to doing certain things in a certain way. Some people use pole shaking to develop "internal strength." Is it possible to develop internal martial arts skill without moving? Isn't it necessary to use external to express internal?
I'd say there's a way to train external or internal separately, but that's just training. Using requires both. I think the main reason many people don't want to discuss "internal" is that it's been done for decades, as long as there's been internet bulletin boards, yet there's never been any demonstration that internal is superior to external. And, ime, most of the tcc practitioners who've been successful have been called "just externalists calling what they do tcc."
Or, they say that doing x will prevent someone from getting q or z. Otoh, others --including everyone who doesn't do tcc-- will say they proof has to be shown in competition when it comes to martial art. So, the debates are just boring and go around in circles. A beginner, imo, is better off if they know exactly what they want (health, fitness, self-defense, tradition, etc) and then find a professor who has had success teaching what they want. Imo, it'd be better to waste a year and find out they weren't getting it than listen to the internet and be confused for a lifetime. The grass will never be green enough, if they listen to the internet.
"A man is rich when he has time and freewill. How he chooses to invest both will determine the return on his investment."