Darth Rock&Roll wrote:There was a guy in the city i grew up in. His name was Brian Coxx. He trained RCMP in D Division what he referred to a Combat Tai Chi. Lots of hard hits, step ins, throw downs. he produced a manual and I think it can still be had at the hippy bookstore "prarie sky books" on wolseley. It's a good manual for applied bad ass tai chi.
his tai chi aint the same as your average old lady tai chi.
It was drawn from Yang style.
Syd wrote:But what are you going to do with regards to the people who just want Tai Chi for health only, are you going to force applications onto them and insist they start working two person fighting sets or else?!
Syd wrote: But what are you going to do with regards to the people who just want Tai Chi for health only, are you going to force applications onto them and insist they start working two person fighting sets or else?!
gretel wrote:Syd wrote:But what are you going to do with regards to the people who just want Tai Chi for health only, are you going to force applications onto them and insist they start working two person fighting sets or else?!
Here's my theory on that and my experience too: Tai Chi form itself, if taken seriously and practiced with commitment, will lead people to start wondering about what it's for, or what the martial aspect is. I could be wrong, and I have a teacher who leads us into the applications. But I don't think you have to "force," but have a little faith in the form itself. IMHO.
gretel
Bao wrote:gretel wrote:Syd wrote:But what are you going to do with regards to the people who just want Tai Chi for health only, are you going to force applications onto them and insist they start working two person fighting sets or else?!
Here's my theory on that and my experience too: Tai Chi form itself, if taken seriously and practiced with commitment, will lead people to start wondering about what it's for, or what the martial aspect is. I could be wrong, and I have a teacher who leads us into the applications. But I don't think you have to "force," but have a little faith in the form itself. IMHO.
gretel
You have a great faith in taiji!
There are countless of teachers who practiced and taught taiji for 30 or 40 years and still have no clue about using their art as self-defence. Maybe they practice some basic tuishou drills. But mostly if you ask them about the martial aspects they will say that the taiji is mostly taught only for health today, or they will say that martial skill comes with form practice and tuishou drills. The truth is that most of what is called taijiquan should not be called so.
Bao wrote:
You have a great faith in taiji!
There are countless of teachers who practiced and taught taiji for 30 or 40 years and still have no clue about using their art as self-defence. Maybe they practice some basic tuishou drills. But mostly if you ask them about the martial aspects they will say that the taiji is mostly taught only for health today, or they will say that martial skill comes with form practice and tuishou drills. The truth is that most of what is called taijiquan should not be called so.
mixjourneyman wrote:Turn on controversial mode: I actually think the greatest benefit that taiji has to offer to the world is as a practice of health and wellbeing. Taiji as a martial art is very hard to learn and only (martially speaking) has the benefit of possibly being able to defend yourself in a violent situation. Most people will benefit much more from getting some stretching and gentle movement with qi visualizations than from learning how to break someones arm.
End controversy: That having been said, I'm totally down for breaking arms (of other people... not my own).
Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 122 guests