I would implore these teachers (and their students) to re-examine their motives in using such titles - it does not reflect well on them, and in turn it makes CMA look silly as well."
My question, which I put out publicly, is why do this (call yourself "Grandmaster") and give a meaningless name to what you teach, except as a way of marketing to the gullible> Is it not enough to say " I teach Xingyi, Dai Family Xinyi, and Sanshou" and let your skill speak for itself?
America is not China, so Chinese title usage and names are very different, below is just a few examples, but america does not look at these titles as chinese do, because it is not China. A sifu or shifu here has nothing to do with relationship
nobody here would even look at a school with titles they dont know such as "Zhangmenren".
Grandmaster is not a boasting thing, here it is genrally considered a founder, or heir to a system. Of course their are exceptions as people can do what they want and some are salesman etc, but for most part the term is used as mentioned, also a title sui ye/ not sure how spelled, is used in areas in china as gm
any business must advertise to have any business and your advertising must be understood by those reading it, and this is american culture. Once they come to your school then you must have something valuable t o keep them their, but you need to get them to even look at you first, especially with arts that nobody even has a clue of what they are. If every other person uses common titles such as shifu, master, grandmaster etc, that is whats accepted here, what can u do?
alot of americans here laugh at discipleship, chinese customs, bowing,lion dancing, and a host of other chinese cutoms, they feel its like cultish fantazy, etc and a teacher student relatonship as in china would be looked at here as 'suspicious" if you know what i mean. right or wrong its just a Different culture.
if chinese people try to teach here according to the customs in china, odds are they will have no buisness.
that has been the xperience of most that have tried. the terms sifu, shifu, master, grandmaster have been in use his since bruce lees era in the 70's as can be seen in magazines at that time, and maybe even earlier.
heres a basic look at a few teachers and titles as found on the web in just 2 minutes
http://www.hawkinscheung.com/http://www.garylamwingchun.com/http://www.pakmeinyc.net/sifu.htmlhttp://www.leekoonhungkungfu.com/grandmaster.htmlhttp://www.shenkungfu.com/choylayfut.htmhttp://iliqchuan.com/content/master-sam-fs-chinbrazilian teachers
http://www.gracie-scoca.com/http://store.gracieacademy.com/p-1893-p ... racie.aspxrussian arts
http://www.ussambo.com/what_is_sambo.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sambo_%28martial_art%29etc etc etc,
I would implore these teachers (and their students) to re-examine their motives in using such titles - it does not reflect well on them, and in turn it makes CMA look silly as well."
cma looks silly on its own in general, titles wont make a difference.
for better or worse- In the world of fighting arts in america , chinese martial arts are not looked at very highly overall except sanshou other than by tho's who themselves practice chinese arts.