Page 1 of 1

Long Fist Would Not Be Useful As A Striking Art? — NTUMA

PostPosted: Thu Jul 30, 2020 11:50 pm
by marvin8
NTUMA台大武學
May 24, 2020


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dqgJCOo0dY

Re: Long Fist Would Not Be Useful As A Striking Art? — NTUMA

PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2020 9:32 am
by aamc
lol... What a username.

Re: Long Fist Would Not Be Useful As A Striking Art? — NTUMA

PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 5:45 am
by Overlord


Alternative view suggests the SJ is not considered CMA. ;D

Re: Long Fist Would Not Be Useful As A Striking Art? — NTUMA

PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2020 10:00 pm
by yeniseri
Changquan is a template!

1. Striking is part of conditioning if you are good at it so do it
2. If you are good at throwing (shuai) then do it. Do the respective jibengong/conditioning
3. If you are good at trapping/locking 9whether feet, limbs, etc) then do the jibengong
4. Train what you are good at and shore up what you are not good at.

Taoluchangquan is just that! It is useless if you do not train its elements of hitting/striking, throwing, etc

Re: Long Fist Would Not Be Useful As A Striking Art? — NTUMA

PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2020 6:40 pm
by edededed
Cai Longyun somehow made his longfist work against a (adult) Russian boxer... and he was just a 13-year old kid! (Or so, this is from memory. I think at first he was allowed to kick, but then they prohibited kicks, too.)

So it seems to have worked before; maybe something is missing now.