strawdog wrote:That's sparring?
strawdog wrote:The title says it was "light sparring". Meaning it was LIGHT SPARRING.
Chris Fleming wrote:LOL at 1:37
Looks great to me. He was able to parry and neutralize everything the man in the red sash came at him with.
strawdog wrote:The title says it was "light sparring". Meaning it was LIGHT SPARRING.
Bodywork wrote:Neither were really sparring now were they? No critisism offered just observations.
in the first one- if the teacher were truly able (lets assume he was) then he should have been fully engaged and pressing the student to the students limits. It was stand offish and very reserved.
in the second one- they were doing drills!strawdog wrote:The title says it was "light sparring". Meaning it was LIGHT SPARRING.
No, it also said learning to flow in applications against a fully resistent oppoenent Contrary to the advert there was no "fully resitant opponent" now was there? Oh were that the measure of fully resistent!! I'd be in heaven. No big deal though. its all good, just not full on force-on-force.
When we spar we have gotten broken bones, bruises, need to see the chiropractor the next day and all manner of mayhem. And we are at least in some manner, getting kicked, hit, thrown, head butted, choked etc for our trouble.
Chris Fleming wrote:How many martial artists does it take to spar? 100. Two to got at it and 98 to say "well they aren't really sparring. what I do is..."
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests