The evidence, to me, points to Choi learning some form of Aiki to a reasonably high (if not master) level, and passing on what he had learned back home. Maybe high-level Daito IS a different animal to Hapkido, but that could be said about many MA.
Andy_S wrote:If you want my personal opinion: The Kuksool, Hwarangdo and Tangsoodo historical claims are not just BS, they are lies, pure and simple. Today, even Korean martial researchers (when you speak to them off the record) do not consider these to be "traditional" MA.
I would say there are three "native" Korean MA;
Taekkyun: A folk dance/sport/MA that came within one practitioner of extinction in the 1980s (which shows how widely practiced MA were in pre-modern Korea - not!) It has undegone a tremendous renaissance and is now practiced all over the country, particularly on student campuses. Part of the attraction is that, yes, this is a traditional Korean MA, un-besmirched by any Jap influence. If you look at Taekkyun it does not look - in its stance and rhythm - anything like any other MA.
SonMudo/Bulmudo: The art of the monks in the temples. Again, within one practitioner of extinction in the 1970s, but was spread throught temples in teh south, and reached the general public in the 80s. Very, very athletic - requires more balance and flexibility than any other MA I have encountered, yet, unlike most KMA, IS widely practiced by older folk - who seem to develop flexibility. If I could explain it, I would say it looks like a cross between Shaolin and Yoga - with a lot of qigong and meditation chucked in. However, it DOES include the Jap shortsword, so they have picked up that from somewhere. FYI, the founder of Hwarangdo claims to have learned a temple art, but it bears zero resemblance to this stuff. (And his brother, who he emigrated to the US with, always admitted he did Hapkido)
Sukyok: Very, very small style: Only one master and one gym in country that I know of. Master said he learned it from a very, very secretie master in a village in central Korea and still has the old manual to prove it. Said master is (apparently) still alive but no longer practices and refuses to meet people. Current master says this is cos in the old days, MA men were thugs and assassins - low class - and he does not like people to know he does it. Looks like a cross between Taekkyun, kungfu and Korean court dance. Application is a lot like Aikido with strikes.
Taekkyun I am reasonably certain is legit: There are accounts, paintings and even one pre-modern photo of it. The other two I may be wrong about, as regards their legitimacy.
Andy_S wrote:Interloper and Bodywork:
I frankly know very little about Daito Ryu but this elitism - "there is no possiblity that Choi could possibly have learned any" -strikes me as being closed-minded in the extreme. Many Aikijutsu people seem to get a kick out of critiizing Aikido in the same vein...and yet it is pretty damned clear that Aikido is Aikijutsu based. The evidence, to me, points to Choi learning some form of Aiki to a reasonably high (if not master) level, and passing on what he had learned back home. Maybe high-level Daito IS a different animal to Hapkido, but that could be said about many MA.
Dan:
I like you and respect your knowledge, but a comment like this:
SNIP
In fact I didn't read a single post above-just skimmed and saw it was the same ol crap.
SNIP
... is frankly unworthy of you. This is a forum. If you have got something to say, say it. Off-hand dismissivness is arrogant, rude - some might say stupid.
Though out of interest, I did spend half an hour last night glancing at various Japanese Daito clips on the tube, and to my eyes, about 70-80 percent of it was familiar to me (from Hapkido...something I stopped training over a decade ago). But if there is something there that only trained eyes can see, so be it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests