Buddy wrote:"I honestly don't know what you're missing about the whole thing."
Of course you do, that's why you continue in this vein.
Still mystified.
"A group of dittoheads is still insisting that Barack Obama is refusing to release his birth certificate."
You'll have to site your source. I just googled "obaba's birth certificate" and could only find reference to it being published. Nothing about anyone still insisting anything.
Perhaps they stopped, then.
""An image of his birth certificate is being served from a subdomain owned and managed by his campaign, and on every page served from that subdomain, there is a tag at the bottom that says "PAID FOR BY BARACK FOR AMERICA", if you do a search for barackobama.com, you'll see in the metadata a mention of my.barackobama.com. I don't know what "IT" is that you're "failing to see, but there is plenty to see in just that which would be a clear indication that this is an official release of the requested information."
Why are you repeating yourself? I said I saw your link. I have no idea what metadata is. Beyond that I didn't see a mention on the home page. Just deal with that reality.
As I mentioned, it's on the right hand side about halfway down. A distinct page element with a login/register for my.barackobama.com button. Perception is about as close to reality as we can ever come, but to insist that your inability to see something as plain as the nose on the sphinx in some way reflects my own reality is a bit misguided.
"And as far as your attempt to play victim to my malicious attacks: "At least pretend intelligence." Seems like a pretty clear throwing of the gauntlet, and a rather sophomoric action in its own right."
That's the difference between real aggression and passive aggression. But fair enough, although I wouldn't think to actually accuse of the nonsense you suggested of me. I think you're nothing but a zealot, but I'm fine with that. I'd like to see you recognize it, but I'm sure you see it as being fair and balanced.
Lol. I'm no zealot, but I believe in Obama as the best possible president for the United States this time around. Under another set of circumstances, I might possibly back a republican, or even a libertarian. But under these, Obama is the best choice, by my reckoning. As far as fair and balanced, these decisions are made based on rhetoric and record. Had it not been for evidence about McCains character that has been made blatantly obvious these last 6 or so years, I'd stand for him, but sadly, he's failed that test.
"This could be yet another manifestation of that self-protection algorithm you don't believe in, maybe."
More passive aggressive bullshit. Could be I just don't like you.
Not at all, no agression whatever in that, but your inability to see facts clearly is pretty much what that study you don't believe in is all about. The fact that you don't like me makes me want to cry in my corn flakes, but you shouldn't let personal feelings get in the way of the truth.