Rereading this thread, I see that a few people have asked how to train it or develop a methodology for working with this state of mind in a more fighty way. Doesn't anybody want to go there?
I disagree with some of the assertions made here. The idea that it isn't two-way already disqualifies lots of exploration that may/can potentially create reproducable skill/ability in any number of people. (Personally, I don't think it's a skill or ability so much as something we're already equipped with as humans, but have lost the frequency for whatever reason) It might be ok to look at the possibility that the mind can be absently engaged in dialogue - be it verbal or through physical expression however subtle or overt - and still be extrasensorially aware
I believe the meditative exercises are just one part of our sensory rehabilitation/reclamation. Another part of that cultivation might include interactive training methods designed to put it under pressure - if only indirectly. It might be more important for some people to recover their ability to hear what is already there before getting into prescribed or 'artificial' meditative practices. For some people, it might be a better idea to learn about the meditative states they create for themselves naturally as a point of entry to this kind of work. Proper training and time spent will take care of everything else. Part of that proper training in a fighty sense is the honesty of failure and how it guides the learning (re-learning in this case) of one of our innate senses. So as usual, I like the idea of creating failure.
I think someone already pointed out in either this thread or the other thread that we selectively deny, filter or block bits of information our senses compile for us, and that that is why our spidey senses fail to protect us. We blame it on a lack of spidey sense when it's actually our stupid filters. There are other points of failure of course, but those might be resolved or brought into the light by exploring that one.
So really, the way I look at it is no different than most except that I think it actually can be explored in an interactive, fighty manner to strengthen the relationship we have with our more subtle sensory signals. The first step is to actually quantify it without the delusion of faith or catagorical assumptions. Many would say that that's all very subjective and can't really be quantified outside of the mind of the individual, and they'd be right. Even so, it doesn't detract from what the individual knows, feels or understands about themselves if they've worked through training methods that bear out the truth beyond coincidence, embeliishment or selective interpretation. Failure is one of the first avenues worth exploring if one is wanting to keep their wits about them.
Which brings this all back to the idea that maybe our extra sensory awareness can actually be accessible on a conscious level.
I don't know as much as some of the others apparently do about 'ESA' so I'm using my own words and ideas and hoping for the best. It would be easy to just cite the work(s) of others or cut&paste someone else's words or post up pictures and youtube clips, but none of that makes for a very practical discussion. It's nice to see some folks commiting their own words and ideas here. It'd be cool to read about ideas others might have for working up some drills or two-person work for no other purpose than to explore a blind alley. What can it hurt?
I have some ideas for drills I can post if someone is willing to actually try them and report their findings.