shawnsegler wrote:The spice must flow.
S
Chris McKinley wrote:It's kinda sad....there's nowhere near enough people dead from this little jaunt.
Michael wrote:The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are pretty much the same as the one we had in Vietnam: the primary motivation is making money. The politicians buy into it in the beginning because it ups their ratings temporarily. The soldiers in Afghanistan are guarding poppy fields, heroin production is at record levels. Hamid Karzai was a Conoco consultant and opium magnate for the whole damn country before the war. In Iraq, you got Bechtel, Halliburton, and Blackwater, plus many others, raking in tha cash, all while trillions of dollars are going missing from the Pentagon, and that's ON TOP OF the no-bid contracts for neo-con insiders.
The wars are not being mis-managed. They are being handled in a way that is most profitable for a select group of people at the expense of the lives of millions of others, just like in Vietnam.
The secondary motivation is depopulation. In addition to millions killed by bombs and bullets, in Vietnam there was Agent Orange (dioxin) lingering for over a hundred years. In Iraq and Afghanistan (as well as Serbia), there are uranium munitions (so-called depleted uranium) lingering with a 4 billion year half life, permanently contaminating large areas, destroying the DNA and health of Iraqi and Americans exposed to it, and spreading through the wind across the globe upping diabetes rates worldwide.
The wars make perfect sense when you have the "correct" perspective.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests