Page 3 of 14

Re: The Russians did it.

PostPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2016 7:08 pm
by Steve James
Nobody really knows who did the hack, only who released it and why. Anyway, would anyone hack the DNC and not the RNC? All parties should be equally concerned, and equally interested in finding out the culprit.

Re: The Russians did it.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2016 1:23 am
by grzegorz
Steve James wrote:Nobody really knows who did the hack, only who released it and why. Anyway, would anyone hack the DNC and not the RNC? All parties should be equally concerned, and equally interested in finding out the culprit.


Yeah, there's definitely something there the way only one side is targeted. Are we supposed to believe was no bias in the RNC? Ausange (sp?) says he has more to release in hopes of keeping Hillary out of office.

Re: The Russians did it.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2016 1:26 am
by Michael
For me it adds to my perception that Assange and wikileaks is a limited hangout, they reveal what they like based on an agenda and they failed to keep Bradley/Chelsea Manning anonymous, so whassup.

Re: The Russians did it.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 4:49 pm
by windwalker
GUCCIFER 2.0
WRITTEN BY GUCCIFER2
JUNE 21, 2016
DOSSIER ON HILLARY CLINTON FROM DNC

https://guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/06 ... y-clinton/

Re: The Russians did it.

PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2016 6:30 pm
by windwalker
Michael wrote:For me it adds to my perception that Assange and wikileaks is a limited hangout, they reveal what they like based on an agenda and they failed to keep Bradley/Chelsea Manning anonymous, so whassup.


WikiLeaks did not identify Manning as their source.

He/They can only reveal what is provided.... This doesn't mean that Assange has a great like for Clinton.

I would imagine how he felt would influence what he released and when...

"Army investigators found pages of chats on Manning's computer between Manning and someone believed to be Julian Assange.[59] Nicks writes that, despite this, no decisive evidence was found of Assange offering Manning any direction."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chelsea_Manning

Re: The Russians did it.

PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 7:36 pm
by chud
IT WASN'T THE RUSSIANS!!!
BREAKING: Julian Assange implies that DNC staffer Seth Conrad Rich was Wikileaks' source for the leaked emails, and was murdered.

WikiLeaks offers $20,000 for information on former DNC staffer's murder: click
If it was a robbery — it failed because he still has his watch, he still has his money — he still has his credit cards, still had his phone so it was a wasted effort except we lost a life. (Seth Rich's father, Joel)



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp7FkLBRpKg

Re: The Russians did it.

PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 8:53 pm
by Steve James

Re: The Russians did it.

PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 8:55 pm
by Michael
chud wrote:IT WASN'T THE RUSSIANS!!!
BREAKING: Julian Assange implies that DNC staffer Seth Conrad Rich was Wikileaks' source for the leaked emails, and was murdered.

WikiLeaks offers $20,000 for information on former DNC staffer's murder: click

There's a quote in that article that says Assange referred to the US election as a choice between cholera and gonorrhea. Possibly belongs in the political jokes only thread. ;D

Re: The Russians did it.

PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 9:17 pm
by chud
Steve James wrote:http://www.snopes.com/seth-conrad-rich/


I did not post the article Snopes mentions, I posted video of Assange himself.

As for the "staff" of Snopes.com:

Image

If you want to trust that, go ahead. ;D They're known to be biased though.

Re: The Russians did it.

PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 9:36 pm
by Steve James
The article wasn't important. It was the implication of murder. In fact, it was the phrase "Assange implies" that made the link to the murder even more tenuous, not to mention that Wikileaks is offering a reward for information about the murder.

Meaning that Assange hinted that the murder was related to Hillary's emails. That's a sick form of capitalization, if you ask me. But, yeah, I know. People will believe what they want to believe. It seems to me that Assange could certainly have just said it straight out, rather than implying anything.

Yep, "many people say" that Snopes is known to be biased; so, listen to FOX news. Ok, we all know that Assange is objective and unbiased.

Re: The Russians did it.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:31 am
by grzegorz
Sounds like dude got robbed, resisted, got shot and the murderers got away.

Maybe it was Hillary.

Re: The Russians did it.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:59 am
by grzegorz
According to Snopes the Russians are the ones who created this story.

Re: The Russians did it.

PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 6:32 am
by chud
grzegorz wrote:Sounds like dude got robbed, resisted, got shot and the murderers got away.


It seems odd that they would kill him and not take the wallet though.

grzegorz wrote:Maybe it was Hillary.


Likely not directly, but could be indirectly - someone eliminating him because they feel that's what would be advantageous for Hillary.

grzegorz wrote:According to Snopes the Russians are the ones who created this story.


;D

Re: The Russians did it.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 11:56 am
by grzegorz
Trump Campaign Aide Named in Ukrainian Probe

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/15/politics/ ... index.html

Re: The Russians did it.

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 12:21 pm
by Steve James
This was known long before, just no details. But, hey, one of Manafort's strongest points was his international connection. To me, this is less interesting than the fact that someone is "leaking" (i.e., hacking: i.e., stealing) information from people near Trump. I'm waiting to hear his reaction. I also wonder if Anonymous is working to find more material.