grzegorz wrote:You think Trump brought up Otto?
We all got played...but some actually voted for this...
Tulsi Gabbard wrote:Yesterday's failure to come to an agreement on NK's nukes brings me no joy, but rather deep concern. But as I said yesterday on @Hardball, NK will not give up its nukes unless there is a complete re-appraisal of US regime change "foreign policy".
WASHINGTON - The Pentagon is permanently canceling the large-scale military exercises in South Korea usually held in the spring, U.S. officials said Friday, handing Pyongyang a long-sought concession only days after a summit between President Donald Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un broke up without a deal.
The timing of the decision raised questions about whether Trump was giving away a major piece of leverage over North Korea, which has long denounced the exercises as provocative, and failing to get anything in return.
"Why negotiate with the United States when it makes concessions for free?" Abraham Denmark, a former top Pentagon official during the Obama administration, wrote in a tweet. He said the decision to halt the maneuvers would have "major implications for readiness" of U.S. and South Korean forces.
Anyway, as I said, I don't think that appearing friendly means anything.
Naw, I don't trust US foreign policy in general, and even less so under Trump.
Sure, Trump or whoever might say the type of government is the issue, but whatever type of govt they have, the US war machine usually falls back on a humanitarian crisis or a violation of human rights to justify its humanitarian intervention and humanitarian bombing. And many people seem to support this rubbish.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests