Michael wrote:Now I'll start the gregorz timer for how long until he connects this to Ukraine and that he thinks I'm in China. 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, .......
the "white men" seem to come up in more and more places in the media. are there any more specific way to recognise them, for example - blond, blue eyed, scandinavian
Michael wrote:Now I'll start the gregorz timer for how long until he connects this to Ukraine and that he thinks I'm in China. 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, .......
grzegorz wrote:So you do still think Sandy Hook is fake.
Got to love Michael.
He wants nothing to do with the States but wants to lecture us on what is happening here.
Steve James wrote:the "white men" seem to come up in more and more places in the media. are there any more specific way to recognise them, for example - blond, blue eyed, scandinavian
Naw, white men only refers to the one group that has always been allowed to vote for most of the history of this country. That's not hate speech or an opinion, that's just the fact. Women didn't get the right to vote until the 1920s in the US and in Sweden. A Voting Rights Act was put in place during the 1960s to (attempt to) ensure the rights of black Americans to vote.
But, the point was that slave owners were voting for things that slaves would reject if they weren't allowed to vote. Change it to Black men and Black women, from 1865 to 1920, and the principle is the same. One group was voting on the rights of other groups. Sure, they used tradition, religion, biology, psychology, and everything else they could imagine to justify their position. All were irrelevant to the people affected. So, the analogy is that only men are in this discussion here, now. It would be great to convince a woman who is considering abortion for medical reasons.
Anyway, it's already been noted; abortions will be done illegally, if not legally.
What do you think the punishment for an illegal abortion should be? Would it apply to the woman and anyone who assisted her?
Ian C. Kuzushi wrote:I thought I remembered you saying you were from Texas. This is about a Texan legislator bringing forth a bill that I find to be representative of a certain demographic in Texas. Do you think such a law would be brought forward in CA? So, if I was wrong about your stomping grounds, sorry for that, but it ain't a non sequitur, pard.
I did take note that you went to a Bernie rally so assumed you are back Stateside for a visit or perhaps to join the against Antifa.
Weird, you seem to be more all over the place than ever. Accusing us of fallacious argumentation but calling all the names after trying to derail and troll this thread.
Michael wrote:Michael wrote:Now I'll start the gregorz timer for how long until he connects this to Ukraine and that he thinks I'm in China. 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, .......grzegorz wrote:So you do still think Sandy Hook is fake.
Got to love Michael.
He wants nothing to do with the States but wants to lecture us on what is happening here.
So under 60 seconds. Impressive from a psychiatric point of view.
Hint to Ian, Steve, etc., this is how you look when you bring up where you think I live or where you think I'm from as a non sequitur in the middle of a totally unrelated topic. I'm embarrassed for you every time because I keep thinking you can do better. Call me optimistic.
Your slavery references have fuck all to do with abortion or the 21st century.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests