Mike, sorry, was away. I read the first link. You wrote that the Democrats banned FOX from participating in presidential debates. I responded that the Democrats were not a network. Okay, from the article:
“That is why I have made it a priority to talk to a broad array of potential media partners, including Fox News. Recent reporting in the New Yorker on the inappropriate relationship between President Trump, his administration and Fox News has led me to conclude that the network is not in a position to host a fair and neutral debate for our candidates,” Perez continued. “Therefore, Fox News will not serve as a media partner for the 2020 Democratic primary debates.”
It was about
moderating a primary debate. So, okay, Fox wasn't allowed to host a Democratic primary debate. OF COURSE, Fox news moderators did host a presidential debate in 2016.
Allowing Bernie to come on to be interviewed is nowhere near comparable, whether one would agree with the DNC's decision or not --about the 2019-2020 campaign, btw.
At any rate, my complaint was that your post was merely condemning "Democrats" and "liberals" for not allowing ... ? while congratulating Fox for interviewing Bernie. My point was that Bernie's points were more important, and that Fox had nothing to be proud of.
Just as in the last election and earlier, the idea is to create a division, regardless of the issue. If it's supported by Democrats (or one of the many hobgoblin terms like liberal, leftist, etc), then it's bad. Anything against them is good, if not better.
So, I decided to register as a Democrat. I've always been an independent, until now. Gotta choose a side, especially the one you're gonna be lumped in anyway.