Ian C. Kuzushi wrote:Okay, so like, "I'm not sayin' I'm just sayin'?"
just saying
there is a lot of stuff people need to ignore, overlook, or not know about
to wholeheartedly embrace how this conclusion of "extremely unlikely" has been obtained
the conclusion could be right
i mean - the conclusion is not worded very definitively
so it is actually hard to find massive fault with it...
its basically a "probably not"
but being sold as a definitive statement of fact (or that is the implication on how it is supposed to be treated..)
but that's a whole other issue with this whole mess of whatever it is that's happening...
edit:
also it seems some people would disagree with your assessment on how Occam's razor applies to this instance:
https://www.uni-hamburg.de/en/newsroom/ ... 1/pm8.htmllink to the study (105pages):
https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... s-Pandemie