Steve James wrote:Imo, if "we" don't see "it," then no one does. Someone who does see a different reality must also see the reality we "see." What those people see, especially if it's a genetic ability, is something others will never. But, in terms of evolution, it hasn't been a necessary adaptation. Still, reality is totally independent of human perception. Our brains are simply making enough sense of what we perceive in order to allow us to survive.
Would you say that our ancestors could perceive more than we can?
Depending on how far back you go, no, maybe?
Don't know, no data for it, only guesses. Have you watched the video? It may have been a follow up podcast where he starts getting in pan psychism and the consciousness of particles and the limitations of interfacing with intelligences that follow different patterns.
The thesis is not that our observation creates reality. It's that our only interface with reality is through a construct informed by sense data, memory, and imagination, and that accurate perception of reality itself is less important than being attuned to the particular species and environmental fitness tests.
He suggests that species evolve "hacks" to help them more readily pass fitness tests by enabling them to ignore the vast amounts of data that doesn't pertain to the business of procreating.