I don't agree with the points in this article that sate the WHO basically did what it was supposed to do
I take heavy opposition to that
-------------- rant on---
-- for example
see the video posted earlier by Micheal - where the WHO dr - (from canada)
when asked about taiwan -- he pretends he doesn't hear and then hangs up the call...
and at the end - when asked about taiwan response to the virus-
he states -- that he has already discussed China - and that they did a good job
the fact that he can say that so smugly
because he is so sure that their will not be any consequences for these lies.....
he knows perfectly well it is a lie he is telling
he knows if he wanted to travel to taiwan - he would have to obtain a visa from taiwan and not china
he knows as a scientist that repeating a lie does not make it true-- no matter how many times..
this motherF&&&ker
----------------
but this article does make the point --
that the WHO recommendations and guidelines
give countries an excuse for their inaction
as they delayed response in accordance to the WHO recommendations--
and can then say - that they did nothing wrong...
the author does does say that it really isn't a valid excuse
but i am pretty sure that is what people are going to use as an excuse...
the same way the CCP quotes the WHO -
to show that they did an exemplary job...
"Those who wanted to have no ears and no eyes for themselves were free to follow the politicization that Tedros clearly brought to the WHO’s communication process, and to use it as an excuse for delayed responses. The excuse might be valid for smaller, less developed and less experienced nations. It does not hold for larger member states with strong participation in the WHO process. "
https://www.institutmontaigne.org/en/bl ... ganizationFranklin