Smack? Why?
All of the points can be made without any hitting or fighting as you will see when we meet. Internal power speaks for itself and those who want to debate it's veracity fail in person...every time they try. It is that obvious. The good thing is that in person; it gets settled, people make friends, compare notes and life goes on. I can promise you we will laugh are asses off.
The only recourse the naysayers have is the internet, adolescent insults and personal attacks.
Dan
lazyboxer wrote:Dan,
What say you and Chris meet over a couple of beers? That usually does the trick
Chris McKinley wrote: I guess it all comes back around to whether or not they display some basic friendliness, courtesy and goodwill. Does their initial behavior indicate that they are interested in being helpful/making friends, or is it more self-serving? How they handle disagreement is also a pretty decent marker. Do they assume ill intent? Do they go ad hominem when one of their ideas is criticized? Do they lie? Do they ignore objective points? How fair are they in disagreement? That just isn't the vibe he's put forth on the forum, so I think I'll pass.
Chris wrote:
You're too unstable, paranoid and even occasionally dishonest (as you just were with me in this very exchange) in conversation when people disagree with you.
On the other hand, and for these same reasons, I've always tried to follow a simple rule, "never say anything online that you wouldn't say to someone in person". Which you guys already know of course, but just thought I'd say it anyway, because it's a REALLY important one, as far as basic online civility goes.
Return to Xingyiquan - Baguazhang - Taijiquan
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests