There is nothing thing racist about criticizing it.
Steve James wrote: The only thing that matters is when he promotes or advocates policies that differentiate among the citizens he's "sworn" to serve.
Steve James wrote:Kamala is a woman, fwiw. But, afa competence, part of her point was that the candidate did not mention the threat of white supremacist groups when talking about threats to "homeland security." Harris saw that as a serious omission, given other comments the candidate had made.
Well, I couldn't say that she was qualified or not to run the agency. I saw the exchange, and it's easy to see that the candidate is dishonest. If "Kirstjen Nielsen" really doesn't know that Norway is a predominantly "White" country, she's either dull as a brick or being dishonest. If dull, then she's incompetent. If dishonest, she shouldn't be confirmed. There'd be no problem in answering "Sure, Norway is a white country."
Of course, the reason for the lack of honesty was the fact that she was defending what the president supposedly said at a meeting on immigration. I.e., that the country needed more Norwegians to emigrate, rather than people from "shit hole" countries. I wasn't there, but I don't think the report is wrong or that anyone made up the story. In fact, I think that lots of people agree that almost anywhere not European is a shit hole.
Well, fleeing from oppressive regimes, crime, poverty, violence, in shit hole countries is exactly why Europeans came to the Americas, in general. And, the US was the only country that actually encouraged Europe's "tired, poor, hungry masses yearning to breathe free." Shucks, Germans and Italian immigrants came from shitholes almost as bad as London in the 19th and 20 century. That includes Trump's grandpa.
Okay, then there's the question of wanting immigrants who are willing to work hard. Give me a break. Norwegian immigrants would be expected to work as hard as Mexican or Salvadoran immigrants. Well, for one thing, Norwegians aren't immigrating to the US because to them, the US is a comparative shit hole. I'm not talking about the inner cities, either. I'm talking the suburbs. Immigrating here means giving up health care, free education, child care, family leave, guaranteed vacation, clean water, fresh food, and a higher standard of living overall. That's why more Americans emigrate to Norway than the other way around.
At any rate, just because you come from a shit hole --like 1920s Germany-- you can still make something of yourself in "America." They used to call it American Exceptionalism, and "only in America." Once upon a time, coming from a shit hole didn't mean you were a shit head.
You seem to assume a lot about what others know, or do not know.
Why again aren't the Norwegians not immigrating to the US?
T-10. New Zealand — 88.45.
New Zealand's tourist board calls it "the youngest country in the world," and it is certainly one of the most beautiful. "Opportunity" is where it scores really high, as a low population means jobs are in abundance.
T-10. Iceland — 88.45.
Speaking of beautiful countries, Iceland scores very well in social progress, particularly in the "basic human needs" index and GDP per capita. Its football team has proven itself a force to be reckoned with too.
9. United Kingdom — 88.58.
The NHS is big part of the UK's high placing, with "basic medical care" scoring almost 100% on the report. Education scores almost as highly, with free access to quality schools.
8. Netherlands — 88.65.
The Netherlands is famously one of the most tolerant countries in the world, so its position in the top ten should be no surprise. It is one of the highest-scoring countries on "personal freedom and choice."
7. Norway — 88.70.
Get used to seeing Scandinavian nations in the top ten. Norway is big on "nutrition and basic medical care," and its "access to basic knowledge" is strong too. Many have said the Norway model is one to follow for a non-EU UK.
6. Sweden — 88.80.
"Water and sanitation" may be taken for granted in developed economies, but it is not enjoyed everywhere. Luckily it is an area Sweden nails, scoring 99.77. The country also picks up high scores in "nutrition" and "personal rights."
5. Switzerland — 88.87.
Switzerland may have some of the most expensive cities in the world to live in, but its citizens get value for money. According to the Social Progress Report, "medical", "nutritional" and "access to basic knowledge" is where the country shines.
4. Australia — 89.13.
There is a good reason so many people want to start a new life "down under." Austrailia has fantastic education, job opportunities and a strong sense of personal freedom. Its "tolerance and inclusion" score could be higher though.
3. Denmark — 89.39.
Denmark has one of the best social mobility and income equality rates in the world, so no surprise it makes it into the top three on this list. "Basic human needs" is where the country scores particularly highly, though its "health and wellness" stats such as life expectancy could be higher.
2. Canada — 89.49.
For such a huge nation, Canada only has 35 million citizens, and they are some of the best looked after in the world. Canada's healthcare is what stands it above the rest. Education and opportunity in the country are also impressively strong.
1. Finland — 90.09.
Everyone says Scandinavian nations have the highest standard of living, and now Finland has made it official. It scores highly on almost every index on the report, from basic needs, foundations of wellbeing and personal freedoms. If you move there just make sure to bring warm coat — temperatures can reach minus 50 celsius in the winter!
Steve James wrote:You seem to assume a lot about what others know, or do not know.
I would ask if you've ever been to Norway. But, I'll bet you know it wasn't an Asian or African country.Why again aren't the Norwegians not immigrating to the US?
It's better in Norway. Now ask me why I don't go to Trondheim.
Bill wrote:I did not hear Trump say anything racist. Haiti isn't a race, it's a country. A poor country that is very badly run by politicians who enrich themselves at the expense of the people. There is nothing thing racist about criticizing it.
Last week he was crazy, this week he's racist, next week my Democrats will be on to another false attack once the racist charge goes away. Repeat, repeat, repeat.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests