Ian C. Kuzushi wrote:Mike wrote:I'm optimistic, so I was hoping for a political angle/solution.
I agree that there needs to be more discussion on a solution to these problems. I also feel that part of the problem is that there is such a vocal movement denying the existence and/or the nature of the problem that it is difficult to proceed until there is some consensus on this.
Here is a short (5min) interview that raises some important points, IMO:
"Prof. Kathleen Belew on understanding the Christchurch terror attack as part of a larger,
transnational white power movement and the danger of viewing it as an isolated “lone wolf” incident."
https://www.npr.org/2019/03/17/70420967 ... AMM-kNkFE4
Mike wrote:I read the transcript. Probably too brief to say much except the part about a transnational ideology spreading. The obvious question is what is the vector? I don't think it's something intangible like hate, but more likely globalization.
Greg wrote:Blaming the murder of 50 in NZ on globalism is ludicrous!
Are you referring to my response to Ian? If so, did you read that transcript? It is very short. I said that globalization is more likely a vector in spreading the white power movement than what the prof. on NPR said because that prof mentioned a symptom of an ideology and failed to suggest the vector of its transmission. By default, my suggestion is more likely than hers because she said nothing. Maybe the interview was too short or that was just an excerpt.
Why did I suggest globalization? Did you read the NZ murderer's manifesto? It is too long, 74 pages with about 30% repetitiveness. On p. 67 he blames globalization for being a factor in the degradation of European/white society. I'll paste it below, but if anyone objects to posting part of it here, I understand and please tell me and I'll remove it, or you can report it directly to the mods with the button and they will remove it.
Globalized capitalist markets are the enemy of racial autonomists
If an ethnocentric European future is to be achieved global free markets and the trade of goods is to be discouraged at all costs.
An environmentally conscious and moral society will never be able to economically compete with a society based on ever increasing industrialization, urbanization, industrial output and population increase.
The cheaper labour and ignorance of environmental health will always result in cheaper goods produced with less effort and inevitably result in control of the market.
A Europe of nature, culture and sustainable living practicing will not be able to ever compete in the global market.
The global market thus therefore never be allowed to compete in the new European market.
Barring the importation of all goods produced outside the New European zone(the new Western world) is an essential pillar of the future Western economy.
Goods produced without care for the natural world ,dignity of workers, lasting culture or or white civilizations future should never be allowed into the new morally focused and ethically focused European market.
CHEAP LABOUR AND ALL CONSUMING INDUSTRY ARE NOT IDEALS, BLOCK FOREIGN GOODS FROM WHITE MARKETS
The next obvious question is: if globalization is a vector for hate / white nationalism / racism, then why is it so? Is it just the obvious phenomenon of different people making their homes in foreign cultures? I don't think so. Imam Tawhidi examines part of this problem when it comes to radical Islam and has created a system of preventing it there. His FAQ of how Islam can work in Western, secular countries is here:
A Dcotrine of Peace