assault style weapon has no meaning
But then you post
“assault weapons,” as defined by state and federal law
Could you at least try?
assault style weapon has no meaning
“assault weapons,” as defined by state and federal law
call the weapons something they are not
you seem to be wanting to make a point based on your opinion just as I have mine..we dont agree...
I could also post things that would tend to support my thoughts by those who are considered experts in the field...
just as you and? If you feel something is silly might want to talk with those who hunt....
As to auto you may or may not not know that M-16A1 can only fire burst of 3 rounds...
there is no "full auto" any more unless it was changed after 95... .
Ian C. Kuzushi wrote:.
Huh? I just said that. You are the one who was bringing up the auto/semi auto dichotomy for your argument. Like I said: keep up and pay attention.
a simplified tutorial on “assault weapons,
Ian C. Kuzushi wrote:Going back and erasing your faulty arguments is really pathetic. You lost. All it took was me being on vacation and taking the time to follow the threads.
windwalker wrote:another one
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests