johnwang wrote:Bao wrote:...So why would you even want proofs that they work?
I had made this work in the street before (Hawaii 1983). Why? Because I might have saved a girl's life that day and that made me happy.
https://i.postimg.cc/fbXkSszf/sweep-head-lock.gif
I have made my art work and I have confidence in my skills. But I understand that it’s impossible to prove to something to someone else. I don’t care if people believe in these arts or not and I have no urge to persuade anyone.
C.J.W. wrote:Trick wrote:C.J.W. wrote:
In the olden days, when people had to rely on martial arts in order to survive on the battlefield or fight against bandits, they had to make sure their techniques worked -- or else be dead.
But how does that fit with this quote?
“These skills will not prepare you for battle, but they can supply you with extra strength. Therefore they too should be a part of military training. On the other hand, civilians who do not have much strength can also learn much that is useful from these skills...
Boxing arts do not seem to be useful skills for the battlefield, but they exercise the hands and feet, and accustom the limbs and body to hard work. Thus they serve as basic training.” - Qi Jiguang, 1560
As a native speaker of Chinese, I've actually read the original writing of the section you quoted.
It should be noted that he was specifically referring to how EMPTY-HAND fighting skills were not useful on the battlefield where a soldier had to deal with multiple weapon-wielding enemies at the same time -- sure makes a whole lot of sense, doesn't it?
Also keep in mind that weapon training and fighting are an integral part of TCMA as well.[/quote]
There were certainly families of different classes practicing martial arts, but I would also think that weapons training was more important to learn in order to protect your home or help your village.