Taiji History - Chen v Yang? (Zhaobao?)

The following typical threads that plague martial arts sites will get moved here if not just deleted: 1 - My style is better than Your style" - 2 - "Internal & External" - 3 - Personal attacks - 4 - Threads that start well, but degenerate into a spiral of nonsense.

Re: Taiji History - Chen v Yang? (Zhaobao?)

Postby GrahamB on Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:27 pm

It's not just similar - it's the same document (Yue Fei's 10 Thesis), with "Taijiquan" and "Chen Chanxing" inserted into it. No offense to the Chens, but it's obviously some sort of attenpt to claim legitimatcy for an older ancestor by rebranding an old document. This wasn't published until well into the commercial period of Taijiquan (1930 and 1935). Marketing has a lot to answer for.

I covered this in my review of Chen Chanxing's book.

https://thetaichinotebook.com/2020/08/1 ... mark-chen/
Last edited by GrahamB on Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:30 pm, edited 3 times in total.
One does not simply post on RSF.
The Tai Chi Notebook
User avatar
GrahamB
Great Old One
 
Posts: 13554
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:30 pm

Re: Taiji History - Chen v Yang? (Zhaobao?)

Postby robert on Tue Apr 27, 2021 9:10 am

GrahamB wrote:It's not just similar - it's the same document (Yue Fei's 10 Thesis), with "Taijiquan" and "Chen Chanxing" inserted into it. No offense to the Chens, but it's obviously some sort of attenpt to claim legitimatcy for an older ancestor by rebranding an old document. This wasn't published until well into the commercial period of Taijiquan (1930 and 1935). Marketing has a lot to answer for.

When is Yue Fei's document published? The reference I gave is 1919.
The method of practicing this boxing art is nothing more than opening and closing, passive and active. The subtlety of the art is based entirely upon their alternations. Chen Xin
robert
Wuji
 
Posts: 741
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:32 am

Re: Taiji History - Chen v Yang? (Zhaobao?)

Postby GrahamB on Tue Apr 27, 2021 9:51 am

1919 might be the earliest publication in book form. I don't know. It was in wide circulation before that though and usually attributed to Yue Fei of the Song Dynasty, which is of course not proveable.

From the 1919 edition it talks of the manual as pre-existing:

"In the summer of 1915, I returned south, and as I passed my hometown, people praised me as a prominent expert for making a study of the contents of Yue Fei’s boxing manual. Within it are nine chapters of essential principles and one chapter on fighting. Although the content of the writing is not without its flaws, the style of the writing is marvelous, powerful, and smooth, and as suits the work of Yue Fei, the theory is refined and thorough. It is certainly not the case that Yue Fei was unable to communicate. I say that equipped with this old Xingyi manual, you too will obtain such a level of clarity.
The Xingyi martial art has over time become much more prominent, and it is urgent for us to now make records of it and take them to Beijing so that connoisseurs and ordinary practitioners alike, as well as ordinary people, can admire Yue Fei. It we protect this material and do not let it slip away, we can help later students to the source.
– written respectfully by Zheng Lianpu"
Last edited by GrahamB on Tue Apr 27, 2021 10:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
One does not simply post on RSF.
The Tai Chi Notebook
User avatar
GrahamB
Great Old One
 
Posts: 13554
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:30 pm

Re: Taiji History - Chen v Yang? (Zhaobao?)

Postby Bhassler on Tue Apr 27, 2021 10:06 am

GrahamB wrote:Marketing has a lot to answer for.


Certainly at least as much in the current array of narratives as in any of the historical ones.
Bhassler
Great Old One
 
Posts: 3546
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 8:05 pm
Location: xxxxxxx

Re: Taiji History - Chen v Yang? (Zhaobao?)

Postby robert on Tue Apr 27, 2021 10:33 am

GrahamB wrote:1919 might be the earliest publication in book form. I don't know. It was in wide circulation before that though and usually attributed to Yue Fei of the Song Dynasty, which is of course not proveable.

Historically, to my knowledge, xinyi was developed by Ji Longfeng AKA Ji Jike (1602 - 1680). It's rebranded as xingyi by Li Luoneng (1808 - 1890). If you prefer myths that's fine.
The method of practicing this boxing art is nothing more than opening and closing, passive and active. The subtlety of the art is based entirely upon their alternations. Chen Xin
robert
Wuji
 
Posts: 741
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:32 am

Re: Taiji History - Chen v Yang? (Zhaobao?)

Postby GrahamB on Tue Apr 27, 2021 10:52 am

You seem pissed off. I don't know why.
One does not simply post on RSF.
The Tai Chi Notebook
User avatar
GrahamB
Great Old One
 
Posts: 13554
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:30 pm

Re: Taiji History - Chen v Yang? (Zhaobao?)

Postby robert on Tue Apr 27, 2021 11:58 am

GrahamB wrote:You seem pissed off. I don't know why.

Really? I'm not.
The method of practicing this boxing art is nothing more than opening and closing, passive and active. The subtlety of the art is based entirely upon their alternations. Chen Xin
robert
Wuji
 
Posts: 741
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:32 am

Re: Taiji History - Chen v Yang? (Zhaobao?)

Postby Bhassler on Tue Apr 27, 2021 12:03 pm

robert wrote:
GrahamB wrote:You seem pissed off. I don't know why.

Really? I'm not.


Obviously not. Anyone who is pissed off writes in all caps. Heven't you people ever internetted, before?
Bhassler
Great Old One
 
Posts: 3546
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 8:05 pm
Location: xxxxxxx

Re: Taiji History - Chen v Yang? (Zhaobao?)

Postby robert on Tue Apr 27, 2021 12:14 pm

Bhassler wrote:Anyone who is pissed off writes in all caps. Heven't you people ever internetted, before?

Not even an exclamation mark! Ooops.

Image
The method of practicing this boxing art is nothing more than opening and closing, passive and active. The subtlety of the art is based entirely upon their alternations. Chen Xin
robert
Wuji
 
Posts: 741
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:32 am

Re: Taiji History - Chen v Yang? (Zhaobao?)

Postby shawnsegler on Wed Apr 28, 2021 2:51 am

As an aside, the GuangPing Yang style I used to practice has a sequence in their form that's EXACTLY the same in one of the ZhaoBao forms.

FWIW.

S
I prefer
You behind the wheel
And me the passenger
User avatar
shawnsegler
Great Old One
 
Posts: 6423
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 12:26 pm
Location: The center of things.

Re: Taiji History - Chen v Yang? (Zhaobao?)

Postby MiaoZhen on Wed Apr 28, 2021 7:32 am

So, if you haven't, you should read Prof. Wile's books on Taijiquan. His is probably some of the best real (i.e., researched and referenced) history on the topic. There is actually some good solid historical research on Taijiquan history, although of course not without its limitations.

https://www.amazon.com/Lost-Tai-chi-Cla ... 171&sr=8-1

https://www.amazon.com/TAi-Chis-Ancesto ... 171&sr=8-7

There's also this really interesting read by Prof. Wile from the Martial Arts Studies Journal:

https://orca.cf.ac.uk/103201/1/729-1835-1-SM.pdf

Again, the history is not completely settled. But we all should be aware of what serious historians are actually saying. It's better than us all being ultracrepidarians!
Dr Henry Ma 馬爾博
--所以練拳術不在形式。只在神氣圓滿無虧而已。
MiaoZhen
Santi
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:53 pm

Re: Taiji History - Chen v Yang? (Zhaobao?)

Postby Bao on Wed Apr 28, 2021 8:19 am

MiaoZhen wrote:. But we all should be aware of what serious historians are actually saying.


Yes of course. But still, if what they say doesn’t follow the common “Chen is the original Tai Chi” narrative, no one listens. ;)
Last edited by Bao on Wed Apr 28, 2021 8:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Thoughts on Tai Chi (My Tai Chi blog)
- Storms make oaks take deeper root. -George Herbert
- To affect the quality of the day, is the highest of all arts! -Walden Thoreau
Bao
Great Old One
 
Posts: 9007
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:46 pm
Location: High up north

Re: Taiji History - Chen v Yang? (Zhaobao?)

Postby MiaoZhen on Wed Apr 28, 2021 8:47 am

Yes of course. But still, if what they say doesn’t follow the common “Chen is the original Tai Chi” narrative, no one listens. ;)[/quote]

We need to be reading all the professional historians and what they are writing, and be open to changing theories depending on actual evidence. So, I agree, with you. If there is serious evidence that opposes the Chen origination theory, we should listen to it. That last article I posted by Prof Wile is a good read in that it presents new documents which very may well upend both the Chen and Yang narratives.

Even though I have an academic background in East Asian history, personally I am a utilitarian. I don't actually care who was first, as long as it all works (depending on how each of us defines work). I also don't personally care about lineage (I am a lineage holder myself, but that only matters to me and my Shifu - it shouldn't matter to anyone else). As long as it works, lineage is also irrelevant. The historian in me finds it all interesting, but what people did 200 years ago doesn't change the time and effort I have to put in for my own practice! 師父領進門,修行在個人!
Dr Henry Ma 馬爾博
--所以練拳術不在形式。只在神氣圓滿無虧而已。
MiaoZhen
Santi
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:53 pm

Re: Taiji History - Chen v Yang? (Zhaobao?)

Postby yeniseri on Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:30 am

shawnsegler wrote:As an aside, the GuangPing Yang style I used to practice has a sequence in their form that's EXACTLY the same in one of the ZhaoBao forms.

FWIW.

S


That is sensible! Zhaobao village (next to Chenjiagou) follows the position of GuangPing (village), a place where the jumping point of this Yang style variant.
I am sure where you have seen the side by side comparison of Laojia Chen style to Yang style, where posture for posture,they mimic each other keeping in mind that utilty and function determines shape and external representation of posture!
Even when Yang changed the names of his art! (creation) from their Chen origin, some of the names were substituted to represent new vision and direction.
When fascism comes to US America, It will be wrapped in the US flag and waving a cross. An astute patriot
yeniseri
Wuji
 
Posts: 3797
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 1:49 pm
Location: USA

Re: Taiji History - Chen v Yang? (Zhaobao?)

Postby Bao on Wed Apr 28, 2021 11:53 am

Even when Yang changed the names of his art! (creation) from their Chen origin, some of the names were substituted to represent new vision and direction.


Have no idea why everyone assumes that it was Yang who changed things, that it was he took away hard movements and did name changes... :P Just because everyone says one thing it doesn’t mean that it’s true.

The common Yang forms today might just as well be closest to the old “Chen style” that YLC learned.
Thoughts on Tai Chi (My Tai Chi blog)
- Storms make oaks take deeper root. -George Herbert
- To affect the quality of the day, is the highest of all arts! -Walden Thoreau
Bao
Great Old One
 
Posts: 9007
Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 12:46 pm
Location: High up north

PreviousNext

Return to Been There Done That

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests