Doc Stier wrote:Good grief! Much is said about the disease pandemic and the various pharmaceutical medicines presented as potentially viable responses to it, but little is said about who has benefited by it all, both financially and politically.
Follow the money and the political power, without emotional attachment to the final outcome, in order to see the truth hidden in plain view of all.
Doc Stier wrote:Good grief! Much is said about the disease pandemic and the various pharmaceutical medicines presented as potentially viable responses to it, but little is said about who has benefited by it all, both financially and politically.
Follow the money and the political power, without emotional attachment to the final outcome, in order to see the truth hidden in plain view of all.
Dragon Bagua wrote: actual whistleblowers and those higher ups caught speaking when their guard is down by actual news outlets such as Project Veritas
oragami_itto wrote:Dragon Bagua wrote: actual whistleblowers and those higher ups caught speaking when their guard is down by actual news outlets such as Project Veritas
1) pfizer employees admit that you get better immunity from surviving COVID-19 than you do from the vaccine.
We knew this. It's like saying "scientists admit water is wet".
2) Pfizer used fetal stem cells to develop the vaccine
No. They didn't. No stem cells are used in the production of the vaccine. There are no stem cells or any other kind of fetal tissue in the vaccine.
oragami_itto wrote:I mean, you do you, just saying you could dig a little...
Dragon Bagua wrote:oragami_itto wrote:Dragon Bagua wrote: actual whistleblowers and those higher ups caught speaking when their guard is down by actual news outlets such as Project Veritas
1) pfizer employees admit that you get better immunity from surviving COVID-19 than you do from the vaccine.
We knew this. It's like saying "scientists admit water is wet".
2) Pfizer used fetal stem cells to develop the vaccine
No. They didn't. No stem cells are used in the production of the vaccine. There are no stem cells or any other kind of fetal tissue in the vaccine.
1) Why won't your "Lord" Fauci who is controlling the covid narrative answer this?
CNN: Why should people with natural immunity still be forced to take the vaccine?
FAUCI: "I don’t have a really firm answer for you on that."pic.twitter.com/vGAIehMOJF
— Dr. Simone Gold (@drsimonegold) September 13, 2021
Fauci, who is President Joe Biden's chief medical adviser, was asked on Friday by CNN's Dr. Sanjay Gupta whether people who have tested positive for the virus should still get a shot. He cited data from Israel in August suggesting people who recovered from COVID-19 had a lower risk of contracting the delta variant than those who got a full Pfizer vaccine.
"I don't have a really firm answer for you on that. That's something that we're going to have to discuss regarding the durability of the response," Fauci said.
The research from Israel, Fauci noted, did not address the durability that natural immunity offers, and he said that it is possible for a person to recover from COVID-19 and receive natural immunity, but then, that person might not be protected for nearly as long as the protection the vaccine offers.
"I think that is something that we need to sit down and discuss seriously," he added.
2) https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/b ... as-ambush/oragami_itto wrote:I mean, you do you, just saying you could dig a little...
oragami_itto wrote:
I wouldn't want to talk to those douchebag hatchet men either.
Dragon Bagua wrote:oragami_itto wrote:
I wouldn't want to talk to those douchebag hatchet men either.
Nice attempt to divert that you were factually wrong about the fetal cells. I picture you running away just like she did from the PV reporters question as to why she sent emails to Pfizer employees telling them not to discuss the fetal cells being in their MRNA (it's not a vaccine) shots.
One of the main emails cited specifically says, “Human fetal derived cell lines are not used to produce our investigational vaccine, which consists of synthetic and enzymatically produced components.” It adds: “One or more cell lines with an origin that can be traced back to human fetal tissue has been used in laboratory tests associated with the vaccine program.”
oragami_itto wrote:Dragon Bagua wrote:oragami_itto wrote:
I wouldn't want to talk to those douchebag hatchet men either.
Nice attempt to divert that you were factually wrong about the fetal cells. I picture you running away just like she did from the PV reporters question as to why she sent emails to Pfizer employees telling them not to discuss the fetal cells being in their MRNA (it's not a vaccine) shots.
Except, no, I wasn't. As I said before it's known that they use fetal cells for testing. It's known that these cells are used to test a range of pharmaceuticals. There are no fetal cells in the vaccine.
I don't know how anybody could get the idea that the public might misrepresent or misunderstand that information.
Even look at the text they're displaying. It does not say that fetal cells were used to manufacture the vaccine. It says "we want to avoid having the information on the fetal cells floating around out there".
Do you know what else the emails say? Here's a snippet.
Source: https://www.berkshireeagle.com/ap/factc ... a5002.htmlOne of the main emails cited specifically says, “Human fetal derived cell lines are not used to produce our investigational vaccine, which consists of synthetic and enzymatically produced components.” It adds: “One or more cell lines with an origin that can be traced back to human fetal tissue has been used in laboratory tests associated with the vaccine program.”
These people, and I use that term loosely, are LYING to you. Directly. Demonstrably. Consistently.
Dragon Bagua wrote:
1) Now would you like to answer why the CDC has set the PCR tests at the 40 cycle for the vaccinated and the 28 cycle for the unvaccinated?
Factually inaccurate: The CDC didn’t change the PCR tests’ cycle thresholds for vaccinated people. The guidance cited in the article refers to genomic sequencing, which is used for identifying the virus’ lineage and variants. It isn’t used to test for the presence of infection. The CDC is still recording all vaccine breakthrough cases, not only the ones that led to hospitalization or death.
2)And why does the CDC count those who die or have adverse reactions two weeks after getting the shot as being unvaccinated?
Return to Been There Done That
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 87 guests