The Grayzone's. Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate discuss the indictment of Donald Trump under the Espionage Act for illegal retention of classified documents, and question whether the indictment is another act of lawfare designed to sabotage the presidential frontrunner after Russiagate failed.
Like how what Biden and Hillary did, clearly treason.
According to John Durham’s report, Hillary Clinton’s plan to link Trump’s campaign to Russia was briefed by former CIA Director John Brennan to Barack Obama and Joe Biden in August 2016. They were all in on it from the beginning.
The investigation led to the attempted coup to rid President Trump from the White House.
Trump battled the intelligence community, FBI, CIA, and others his entire first term.
Democrats and their mainstream media gladly and willingly spread this lie for years.
Steve James wrote:The presidential frontrunner? He's been running since 2021. And, c'mon, they say the same about the trial in NYC, the trial in GA, and upcoming trials in DC. It's only going to get worse.
But, let's say that it's true and it's all for political reasons to prevent him from winning the election next year. SO WHAT! In 2016, Trump campaigned on the phrase LOCK HER UP! I say turn about is more than fair play. Remember, the investigation of Hillary started in 2016. And, it worked, even though nothing came of it, he won the election. Plus, what does he say should be done? Lock up Biden for crimes and election interference. So, f*ck that sh*t. If people want to whine about unfair treatment, cry me a river. I say Trump lays the template for what should be done.
leaving out what HRC actually did but was not prosecuted for..
No one is talking about "un-fair" treatment... .
People are pointing out discrepancies in the system, the fiction of a two party system
Oh, afa fairness, some people are bitching that Hunter Biden got off too light.
they are pointing out that others changed with the same crimes
were treated differently....why?
Like when people get shot, its on video.
Somehow one person in the jury questions the state of mind of the killers
Resulting in a hung jury...
Sure, an investigation started by Trump's DoJ, with a Trump appointed prosecutor, got a Biden on tax evasion (which he paid back) and a gun charge. If the deal is accepted, he might not get any jail time. But, hold on, why was the investigation allowed to proceed after Biden got in office. Usually, Presidents replace all federal DAs; but Biden kept Trump's on (awa his FBI director). Does anybody believe that Trump would investigate Ivanka, Jared, or Don Jr? If they want fairness, they should investigate how Jared got $2 billion from the Saudis while working in the WH. What would Trump say then?
Don't know what he would say, ask him...
His family was investigated. Do you seriously believe that they if they found anything they could've been charged with they wouldn't have
It's just tfb that he's campaigning for president again. Since he is, whatever he suggests be done to the other guy should be exactly what he gets.
According to John Durham’s report, Hillary Clinton’s plan to link Trump’s campaign to Russia was briefed by former CIA Director John Brennan to Barack Obama and Joe Biden in August 2016. They were all in on it from the beginning.
The investigation led to the attempted coup to rid President Trump from the White House.
Trump battled the intelligence community, FBI, CIA, and others his entire first term.
Democrats and their mainstream media gladly and willingly spread this lie for years.
The impeachment investigations were not attempted coups. Everything was lawful, and that's not a coup.
It's not about Trump,,,
It does illustrate what's happening and going on in the US.
The system is broken.
Maybe it always was from the beginning.
Hopefully as the world re-aligns this gets corrected...
Sounds like more typical American bullshit .
Steve James wrote:Sounds like more typical American bullshit .
Ah, so you're not American. Good to know.
Steve James wrote:
It sure is about Trump. The question is whether others are being treated like him.
What's going on in the US? Trump was president for four years, and look what happened. Look at all the firsts. I don't recall any presidential candidate question the identity of a US President or call for his political opponent to be locked up. When people call for his incarceration, however, he says it's unfair. We'd never hear a President ask another country's president to find dirt on his political opponent.
It might be more fair to say, most political insiders will not say things that he said publicly because as insiders they know what will happen. Of course there are always hot mics around
The system isn't broken because of Trump, but he illustrates it. Of course, it depends on what one thinks the system is. If it's "Equal Justice Under Law" then maybe it's always been broken. However, when there are laws affecting people unequally, it's hard to fix it. Clearly, we can make things more "equal," but we all know that a lot of people don't want that at all. It's like demanding free speech, but making laws to limit what people can read or hear. People like that Trump tells cops "When you put the criminal in the car, make sure to give his head a little bump on the way in."
he can't "say that" what can he say
What part of the Constitution that covers his actions did he violate ?
What people like Trump..?
And, afa this rearrangement or world reset, Reset to what? The world economy? China and India dominating world markets?
The US in decline is going to affect the judicial system in the US?
Makes no sense, but I've been hearing it for a long time. Frankly, since I've been on EF/RSF, the only political issue that has ever affected me was the pandemic.
That's why we could bs about political stuff.
Notice the new finding about the pandemic coming out ..
Today, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the economy or condition of the country that affects me. The claim that the country is a banana republic because one's favorite politician (millionaire) is or isn't being prosecuted is just something to have fun with because [b]the US definitely ain't a banana republic
[/b]. Well, Florida might be considered an orange republic with its current leadership. Want to start a thread about banning books being great?
banana republics are often characterized by weak institutions, corruption, and political instability.
The ruling elite or a small group of individuals often hold disproportionate power and wealth, while the majority of the population may experience poverty, limited access to basic services, and a lack of political representation.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests